home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: news.crystalball.com!news
- From: Larry Weiss <lfw@oc.com>
- Newsgroups: gnu.misc.discuss,comp.std.c
- Subject: Re: Coding Standards are ignorant
- Date: Mon, 11 Mar 1996 09:19:20 -0600
- Organization: crystalball.com
- Message-ID: <31444478.4F83@oc.com>
- References: <4gum82$14v4@info4.rus.uni-stuttgart.de>
- <1996Mar403.23.06.8316@koobera.math.uic.edu>
- <4he37i$a0u@solutions.solon.com> <4hf9m1$fp8@fg70.rz.uni-karlsruhe.de>
- <4hfecl$33t@solutions.solon.com>
- <KANZE.96Mar5131710@slsvgqt.lts.sel.alcatel.de> <danpop.826218405@rscernix> <KANZE.96Mar8125719@gabi.gabi-soft.fr>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: external.oc.com
- Mime-Version: 1.0
- Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
- X-Mailer: Mozilla 2.0 (Win16; I)
-
- J. Kanze wrote:
- >
- > IMHO, talking about ANSI C is about the same as writing `void main()';
- > it generally works, and most people/compilers will know what you are
- > talking about, but that doesn't make it right.
- >
-
- Again, that's why I just say "Standard C".
-
- And, that's also how P. J. Plauger and Jim Brodie have handled it in their
- book "Standard C" (Microsoft Press).
-